How is this different from a completion report?

A completion report answers who opened the course. Here you also see the lesson where people drop off, which questions fail to separate those who know the material from those who do not, and what is still remembered a month after the test.

Does a manager see data for other departments?

Only if you configure it that way. Access is split by role: a manager sees their own team and L&D sees the whole picture.

Can the data be exported?

Yes, to XLSX. From there you can calculate it however you like, with no need to contact support for a dump.

No. The platform cannot confirm that a test was taken unaided. For mandatory training with legal consequences that may matter, and it would need a different system; for skills development, policing independence usually creates more resistance than value.

Does it work for employees without a work computer?

Yes. Courses are taken from a personal phone without a corporate email address, and those people appear in the analytics on the same terms as the office.

Is analytics a separate licence?

No. It is part of the learning module, and every module is in one plan. The portal is free up to 20 employees.

Corporate learning analytics

Learning effectiveness analytics

Review completion, knowledge-check results, the questions people get wrong and the differences between teams. These are the numbers that tell you which lesson to rewrite and which manager to talk to.

Completion and resultsQuestion-level statisticsXLSX exportRole-based access

app.teamevo.co/main/admin/learning/analytics

Learning analytics

Search or run a command…⌘K

Control centre

Kate EllisAdministrator

Courses and assignments

Information security83%

142 118 overdue 6

Handling objections61%

64 39 overdue 11

Onboarding: how the company works91%

23 21

17 employees need help

How to read the learning data

1
Separate activity from result
Completion is an engagement metric; knowledge-check results are a learning metric. Look at both and draw conclusions from the second.
2
Find where people drop off
Lesson-level analytics show the step at which people abandon a course. It is usually one specific lesson rather than the course as a whole.
3
Check the questions themselves
A question answered the same way by people who understood the topic and people who did not is measuring nothing. The statistics make those questions visible.
4
Compare the teams
A gap between departments is a conversation with a manager rather than a reason to send everyone through the course again.
5
Look at the trend
One measurement is a photograph. A repeat check a month later shows whether the knowledge stayed or evaporated after the test.
6
Change the course
A weak lesson is rewritten, a bad question replaced, and the program republished as a new version. The next cohort learns from the corrected one.

What the platform shows

Course analytics

Completion rate, median time to finish, and the long tail of people who are stuck, plus drop-off on specific lessons.

Learning module

Question analytics

A discrimination index shows which questions actually separate those who know the material from those who do not, and which ones are worth rewriting.

By cohort and by person

From the picture for a department down to one employee, without switching reports or requesting a separate export for each question.

Repeat knowledge checks

Short reinforcement sessions after a course show what is left a week and a month later rather than immediately after the test.

Connected to onboarding

Learning progress is visible alongside onboarding tasks, so it is clear whether a new hire is stuck in a course or in the work steps.

Together with the My tasks module

Mandatory training control

Who has completed it, who has not, and whose deadline is expiring. A compliance question takes a minute instead of half a day of reconciling exports.

XLSX export

The data can be taken out and recalculated your own way, in an ordinary format and without asking support for a dump.

Role-based access

A manager sees their own team, L&D sees the whole picture, with no incidental access to other departments' data.

RBAC with targeted roles

Frequently asked questions

Automatically, no. It shows completion, knowledge-check results, weak topics and trends by team. The link to revenue, defects or turnover is built by hand, by comparing periods and groups. A vendor promising an automatic training ROI figure is most likely calculating something other than what you mean.

Related TeamEvo capabilities

Portal analyticsThe neighbouring hub: activity by department, section popularity and searches that return nothing.LearningHow the learning this analytics describes is set up.Course builderWhere a weak lesson is rewritten and a bad question replaced.Employee onboardingA new hire's courses alongside the rest of their onboarding steps.SurveysWhat people say about the training, beyond what the numbers show.Admin and securityRoles, permissions and who can open which report.PricingEvery module in one plan, free up to 20 employees.

See what the learning analytics shows

Free for teams up to 20 employees. No card, no implementation project and no call with a sales manager.

Create a free portal See pricing